#Samplitude pro x2 looping full

You have to know what Cubase to understand that. MIDI side, PT has real value and works very well for many things, but lacks 100 useful functions.

I also want to move a series of markers combined!

#Samplitude pro x2 looping full

I would like to visually see the full path of an audio stream from the input to the output, through all groups, FX, AUX, with indicating the inserts. For example, the routing scheme should have an overall window. Many interesting features among other DAW must be integrated. However, I hope that Avid will do development. I know there's a lot of momentum to Steinberg products, but for the record, I do not carry. Except for some complex MIDI manipulation, which Cubase is master (where Samplitude is zero, and Pro Tools is average, mostly because it does not have all its functions well presented and that it does not maps like Cubase), I back Pro Tools. Sweetness and voice clarity, proximity, balance, gentle piano, everything. I was also certain that Cubase was going to be at least in Pro Tools. Pro Tools, which I had distanced myself, is winner. Samplitude, despite its complications and its outdated interface, did well. I defended Cubase, but it's over for audio. There is a sail, a blockage on audio, choking. The three DAW with the same settings, including the panoramic width.Д¬ubase, which I love for MIDI, but I thought best for audio recording, disappointed me. Setup: Voice (a Neumann TLM49 on an SSM-10 Martinsound, mono), 2 AKG 414 XL II is in stereo preamplifiers SSL) and piano (Vienna Imperial VSL). The reasoning seems good, but the facts contradict it. 'Pro Tools 12', 'Cubase Pro 8' and 'Samplitude Pro X2.' I know some people think that the difference is impossible, but they let their ears to the locker room. I do not know if they are interested, but I did a day of testing with three DAW.